Federal Habeas Corpus Relief
Criminal Law & Procedure: Habeas Corpus: Cognizable Issues
A state prisoner who has been incarcerated for a criminal offense by a state court may challenge his or her conviction by filing a petition for habeas corpus relief in a federal court. The federal court has jurisdiction over the prisoner’s custody in a state correctional institution if the incarceration constitutes a violation of the United States Constitution or the laws of the United States. The prisoner’s federal habeas corpus petition seeks to secure the release of the prisoner from an unlawful custody. However, in order to be able to file the federal habeas corpus petition, the prisoner must be in custody, the custody must be unlawful, and the prisoner must have exhausted his or her state remedies.
Although federal habeas corpus proceedings are usually the result of a criminal prosecution, the proceedings are not criminal proceedings. The proceedings are separate civil proceedings, which are governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They are generally filed against a state officer who has custody of a prisoner, such as a superintendent or a warden of the correctional institution in which the prisoner is incarcerated.
A state prisoner is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief unless the prisoner is in custody pursuant to a state court’s judgment. Although the prisoner does not need to be in physical custody, the prisoner’s physical movements must be legally or physically restrained. A prisoner who has been paroled or who is on probation is considered to be in custody for purposes of federal habeas corpus relief.
A state prisoner is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief unless his or her custody violates the United States Constitution or the laws of the United States. A violation of a state’s laws cannot be reviewed in a petition for federal habeas corpus relief. Claims that are recognized in a petition for federal habeas corpus relief generally involve constitutional questions such as the prisoner’s due process rights, right to a jury trial, or right to counsel.
A state prisoner is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief unless he or she has exhausted all his or her state remedies. This means that all the prisoner’s claims must have already been litigated in the state courts. The claims must be based on the same facts and legal theories. If the state claims were based on different facts or different legal theories, the prisoner has not exhausted his or her state remedies.
A state prisoner has not exhausted his or her state remedies if he or she has a right under state law to raise a claim. The prisoner has exhausted his or her state remedies if he or she has proceeded through the state’s entire appellate process on the same claim that is being presented in his or her petition for federal habeas corpus relief. The prisoner will also be deemed to have exhausted his or her state remedies if he or she can prove that there is no available or effective remedy for his or her claim in the state courts or by proving that presenting the claim to the state courts would be futile.
Copyright 2014 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.